Editorial Standards
AIAGI.news is committed to providing accurate, timely, and actionable intelligence on AGI developments. Our editorial standards ensure every signal meets rigorous verification criteria before reaching our readers.
Core Principles
Verification First
Every signal is reviewed by a human editor before publication. We verify claims against primary sources and cross-reference with multiple outlets when possible.
Transparency in Sourcing
We always link to primary sources. When information comes from secondary reporting, we clearly indicate this and provide the chain of attribution.
Confidence Grading
We grade every brief with a confidence score (Verified, Reported, Speculative) so readers can assess the reliability of information at a glance.
Impact Assessment
We categorize signals by impact level (Structural, Incremental, Minor) to help readers prioritize what matters most for their decision-making.
Editorial Process
Signal Detection
Our Scout Engine monitors 6 languages across 12 AGI categories, pulling from academic papers, government announcements, corporate disclosures, and verified news sources.
Human Review
Every detected signal enters our editorial queue. A human editor reviews the source, verifies claims, and assesses relevance before any publication.
Structured Analysis
Approved signals are formatted into our 4-part structure: The News (what happened), Why It Matters (implications), Sources (evidence), and Category (impact zone).
Publication & Monitoring
Published briefs remain on the Live Frontier for 24 hours, then move to our searchable Library. We monitor for corrections and updates continuously.
Confidence Score Definitions
Questions or Concerns?
If you have questions about our editorial standards or wish to submit a correction, please visit our Corrections Policy page.